Trouillot in Silencing the Past sets up a masterful argument regarding what he
calls the “silences” that are invariably present in any historical narrative. His second chapter, regarding the three silencing’s
of Colonel Jean-Baptiste San Souci, and how his example demonstrates how easily
and how thoroughly history can bury those that make it. In this chapter, personally, I found
Trouillot’s discussion of the Colonel’s lack of presence in archival and
narrative locations particularly compelling as someone who has cut his teeth in
archives. The “silencing” of the
Colonel, something that I have seen numerous times as an archivist and someone
who has worked in locations devoted to interpreting history (Gettysburg NMP),
the concept that lack of coverage of certain individuals and events as neither “neutral
or natural” speaks to me (Trouillot, 48).
San Souci was the victim of first
being silenced physically by his superior officer (Christophe) at bayonet
point, then his name as his own silenced when Christophe used is as his palace’s
moniker, then further that palace lost its name to Frederick the Great of
Prussia’s like-named palace. The truly tragic
aspect of this silencing of San Souci, a great military as well as political
leader during the Haitian Revolution, is that it is perpetuated by Haitians
themselves. In conforming to what
Trouillot calls the Western “guild practice” of history, the Haitian amateur historians
leading tours around San Souci, as well as those who write history, tend to
overlook the contributions of the Congo (rather than Creole) San Souci during
the war against the French. More
interesting is that San Souci’s story was actively attacked and silenced
immediately following his death.
Politics and jealousy resulted in his disappearance from the public
record and mind almost before his body was cold. Trouillot argues that this is a result of an
effort by Christophe to bury his memory present and future. Christophe erased San Souci’s story even
before it was written. Ostensibly, the
same occurred with the Haitian Revolution itself.
The Haitian Revolution is arguably
one of the most important revolts in Western civilization, yet receives little
recognition nor coverage from scholars.
Why? For one, Trouillot argues,
the Revolution was buried by seemingly “more important” revolutions in the
United States and France during the same period. This deliberate silencing can be chalked up
to the Western centric study of history and also due to the actions of those
two nations (along with other Western countries) during the immediate aftermath
of the Revolution. At its heart, the
Haitian Revolution was a slave revolt.
At that, it was the first successful, nation-wide, revolt of African
slaves in the New World. The West looked
to the newly independent nation with much fear and trepidation and thus sought
to bury it under trade embargoes and ignominy for the next century. The Revolution was silenced by fearful nations
for racial (and in the case of France) and prideful reasons. The Haitian Revolution, like Colonel San
Souci, was buried by history before its body had cooled.
No comments:
Post a Comment