Prescott, Bloch, and Cronon (like most historians)
share the concern of uncovering what has previously been hidden in history to
reveal new meaning. Prescott
uncovers the hidden genius of Cortes.
Bloch uncovers the extensive social relations between lords and vassals
to explain a previously hidden social history. Although Bloch and Prescott also demonstrate a concern for the
environment, their concern is limited to how the environment set the stage for
the people of interest as primary historical actors. For instance, Prescott describes the mountain ranges to
depict Cortes’ military genius, and Bloch describes coastlines and European
geography to explain invasions and raids.
Cronon flips this concern on its head, and views the environment itself
as an actor. This reversal does
the work of uncovering silences of the historical record because Cronon is
looking at environmental changes that are invisible in other histories.
Cronon’s conception of environmental history seems
to emerge from social history. For
example, like social historians and annalists, Cronon looks at sources and
subjects in new ways and showing how elements of history are interrelated. This examination of history, like that
of social historians, begs for an interdisciplinary approach, which Cronon
employs. However, Cronon critiques
social historians for ignoring the environment. He argues, “Changes in the way people create and re-create
their livelihood must be analyzed in terms of changes not only in their social relations but in their ecological ones as well” (13). Here, Cronon implies that the work of
economic and social historians has been limited. In providing the ecological
history of colonial New England, Cronon is also describing a human history,
making the point that it’s all related.
No comments:
Post a Comment