Between the early 1600’s to mid-1800’s, the environment of New
England was irrevocably transformed – extinction of animals, deforestation,
land overuse and soil erosion, and transfer of ownership of most land to the
Europeans from Native Americans. In Southern
New England, the land changed from a densely forested area to a pastoral
farming community, complete with fences and domestic farm animals. In answering the question “how did this
happen”, Cronin takes an ecological perspective that is different than a
traditional historical view of just the human interactions – his ecosystem includes
both human and non-human elements. In
discussing the history of land usage in New England, he looks at the differing cultural
view held by the Indians and the
settlers on land ownership, property rights, agricultural methods, hunting,
domestic animals (to name a few) and how this contributed to the transformation
of the land in New England. He goes even
further, looking at the biological impacts to the land of new or disappearing
vegetation, heavy foresting, overharvesting of corn, insects, even weeds.
The concept of ecological history is fairly new, so I doubt
that either Prescott or Bloch shared Cronon’s concerns about environmental
history. Both Prescott and Bloch would
consider land a resource for food, water, and as a terrain that can help or
hurt communities or armies (ease of access, challenging topography, quality of
land, natural resources/gold). Prescott
would describe the land as Cortes and the Spaniards see it, but not as part of
the change brought about by the Spaniards.
And since he had never been to Mexico, he was totally reliant on the
source documents he researched. Bloch definitely
sees the value of land in terms of ownership, and how feudal societies used
land ownership to establish fiefdoms and power positions. But again, I didn’t see any reference in his
writing to how land usage impacted historical change. If asked, both would
probably see the environmental changes as necessary in “civilizing” the new
world.
I thought this was an amazing book – to interlace the human
story of the Indians and the Colonialists with the ecological history of the
land provides a totally different perspective on how the environmental changes
in New England came to be. It gives a
whole new meaning to the expression “If a tree falls in the forest ….”, because
whether someone hears it or not, it is connected to a much larger set of
ecological factors that will be heard.
No comments:
Post a Comment