“Emotional control is the real site of the exercise
of power: politics is just a process of determining who must repress as
illegitimate, who must foreground as valuable, the feelings that come up for
them in given contexts and relationships. To study emotional expression, then,
is necessarily to investigate power relations” (Eustace, 11).
For Eustace, the agent of historical change is
emotional expressions. Those who know how to control the emotional expressions possess
power and status; meanwhile, those who do not know how to control the emotions
are then seen as the lower class. Even if the lower class could control their
emotional expressions, the elite still looked at them as the submissive.
However, through the study of emotions, one begins to realize how weak the
status divisions are. “Indeed, though members of eighteenth-century colonial
elites initially turned to emotion in search of a reliable mark of exclusivity,
they could not hinder emotion’s eventual emergence as a key element of natural
equality” (Eustace, 15). The emotions reshaped the power relations because the
feelings and expressions were changing through language which was the key form
of social communication. Therefore, language is what gave the emotional
expressions meaning. Common emotions became the basis for natural rights.
As far passions go, for Eustace, passions are what
drive us, but reasons are what guide us. “Reason the card, but passion is the
gale” (Eustace, 4). The reasons will tell us where we need and should go in
life, but the passions are what actually move us. Therefore, passions drive us
to change or at least move forward (hopefully).
No comments:
Post a Comment