Kierner’s
book, Scandal at Bizarre, recounted
an interesting view of the world of the post-War for Independence gentry in
Virginia. By using the “scandalous”
behavior and associated misfortune of Richard Randolph and his sister-in-law
Nancy to demonstrate the decline of the world inhabited by the landed gentry in
Virginia following independence, Kierner was able to provide a window into the
larger world of the Old Dominion in the late 18th Century. After the War for Independence, while
attempting to regain their former prominence in the social and political world
of Virginia, the gentry clung to their former way of life. However, their mounting debt and adherence to
old customs of honor coupled with the changes in social values brought about by
republicanism hastened their decline.
Ill equipped to the survive in this new world, many of the old families
of Virginia simply wilted away.
Kierner used a combination of primary sources, to include court records, personal correspondence, newspapers, and contemporary fiction novels, and the work of other historians to tell her narrative. As someone who appreciates narratives that use primary sources to tell the story, I found this aspect particularly enjoyable. However, I am not sold on histories that use the works of other historians to prove the author’s point. For me, the primary sources often speak for themselves, especially when recounting an event like in Scandal at Bizarre.
What I found
interesting about the book was the active participation in the drama of two
patriots that are relatively unknown to the general public, St. George Tucker
and Gouverneur Morris. I was familiar with
the military, political, and legal activities of these two men, but was unaware
of the details of their personal lives and how those details shaped their public
actions. Tucker’s role was especially
interesting to me. As a reenactor of
this period, it was enjoyable to learn about this veteran’s private life
following the war. It is that complete
person that I am truly interested in studying.
No comments:
Post a Comment