In response to this week’s prompt, I do not believe that
Malintzin was a traitor. In order to be
a traitor, she would have had to possess the ability to freely choose to go to
the Spanish side. I can understand the
argument that perhaps she should have gone down in a blaze of martyrdom and
embodied in her final moments the pride of her people. However, more than anything else, Malintzin
was realistic about her situation, a point that Townsend gets at time and time
again. The fact of the matter was that more
Spanish would come to the New World, even if the indigenous could manage to
improbably defeat Cortes’s crew.
Furthermore, Cortes was going to have his words interpreted one way or
another. By stepping up to fill this
role, Malintzin put herself in a position from which she could help the
indigenous far more than she could have at any other point in her life. By translating for Cortes, she could make it
clear that more Spanish would come and that the indigenous should lay down
their arms. In doing so, it is probable
that she saved many indigenous lives.
However, had she chosen to die rather than to translate, or chosen to
remain silent instead of offering her services when the opportunity first
appeared, she would have helped no one. Had
she reveled in her newfound power and privilege with no concern for the
indigenous people, perhaps then one could consider her a traitor, but this was
not the case. Malintzin was in a very
difficult situation and simply tried to make the best of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment